Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Riposte
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:07, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- La Riposte (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable organization, article is self-promotional. Largely unsourced and no reliable sources as to the group's notability, one source is a self-source since Hands off Venezuela is an affiliate of La Riposte's parent group and the article is credited as "written by La Riposte", the second source makes no reference to La Riposte and is therefore not a sign of its notability. Article reads largely like an advertisement for the organization. Vale of Glamorgan (talk) 03:05, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as nominator. Vale of Glamorgan (talk) 03:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:06, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep La Riposte has recently become a significant political force within the French Communist Party. While there's not much independent coverage of this subject matter in English, I was able to find one source covering La Riposte's role in the party's most recent congress which could be incorporated into the article: http://www.cpgb.org.uk/article.php?article_id=1001850 Sickle and Hammer (talk) 06:38, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:54, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep (at least as dab page) per WP:ATD. The article currently refers to newspapers from both the French Communist Party and Québec solidaire section of the International Marxist Tendency. Subject to notability of those publications (are they distinctly separate?), the article should at least exist as a dab page to French Communist Party and Québec solidaire. -- Trevj (talk) 11:01, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wifione Message 08:01, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.